88ֳ

INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

NSW chief scientist reports on CSG

FOLLOWING a fact-finding tour on CSG production in New South Wales, chief scientist Mary O'Kane i...

James McGrath

This article is 11 years old. Images might not display.

88ֳ

As part of wide-ranging changes to the state’s treatment of CSG outlined in February, O’Kane has been on a tour of existing communities and CSG activities to get a grip on whether the activity is potentially harmful.

While she found there was indeed a great deal of angst over the issue in communities where CSG reserves were predicted to lie, it could be overcome with a commitment to transparency while ensuring engineering best practice, rather than as a minimum requirement.

“The challenges faced by government and industry are considerable and a commitment from all parties will be required to improve the existing situation and build trust with the community,” O’Kane said.

Specifically, she recommended best practice in training employees and contractors, as well as high-level monitoring and stringent compliance inspections.

Interestingly, she also found that punitive measures for operators not abiding by standards be “hefty” and said licence revocation should be on the table.

The other major point she highlighted was the need for whole-of-environment data to be made available to the public.

She called for a subsidence baseline to be considered, going back 15 years using appropriate remote sensing data.

Then, she argued, the government could take data annually to see if there were any changes to subsidence as a result of CSG activity.

It isn’t the end of the review though, with O’Kane to continue her review into next year.

She said the focus would turn to landholders’ legal rights; examining appropriate levels of industry insurance; and conducting a full industry compliance study.

O’Kane said she would be analysing the methods for CSG risk assessment.

In her summation, she noted that “all sides of the debate were united in being cross with the government” and added that despite a lack of data on hydrological matters in the state, both agriculture and mining had been allowed to proceed.

“We do not have a comprehensive map/model of these resources in Australia yet but we still proceed with major agricultural and mining activities whose total impacts on our groundwater system are much more significant than CSG developments in Australia at this stage,” she said.

However, she stressed that CSG required high-ordered engineering solutions and it was not a space for “undercapitalised players”

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the 88ֳ Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the 88ֳ Intelligence team.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence: Future Fleets Report 2025

MMI Future Fleets Report 2025 looks at how companies are using alternative energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emmissions

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence: Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024

Exclusive research for Mining Magazine Intelligence Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024 shows mining companies are embracing cutting-edge tech

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.